A key to achieving high yield: good uniformity

Cobb releases process report focused on uniformity.

Good flock uniformity allows plants to produce more of the higher-value products. (Cobb-Vantress)
Good flock uniformity allows plants to produce more of the higher-value products. (Cobb-Vantress)

Live production has multiple impacts on the outcome of product quality and yield. Factors including bird health, feed withdrawal, catching practices, and transportation logistics can directly impact the quality and quantity of yield. However, good uniformity can impact the quality and quantity of the entire flock being processed.

Poor uniformity will create issues along the processing continuum. Excessive amounts of small birds create difficulty with stunning and bleeding settings. Small birds mixed into a flock create a difficult picking configuration and usually results in carcasses with legs pulled out of shackles and over-picking. Very large birds have picking issues including under-picking and “riding over” the pickers. Small birds will overscald compared to larger birds. Additionally, performance of evisceration and automated cut-up and debone equipment suffers and rates of bird damage, rework, and product loss increase as uniformity decreases.

Cobb David Beavers

David Beavers (Cobb-Vantress)

In plants that size carcasses before selecting them for further processing lines, small birds will not fit into a value-added product line. For this reason, good flock uniformity allows plants to produce more of the higher-value products.

Measuring the impacts of uniformity on processing

Standard deviation is a measure of how widely values are dispersed around the average value (the mean). A wide standard of deviation indicates poor uniformity. Therefore, as the standard of deviation increases (i.e., uniformity decreases) the coefficient of variation will increase.

[Standard of deviation (grams) / Average bodyweight (grams)] * 100 = Coefficient of variation (CV) %

 

Table 1. The relationship between uniformity and coefficient of variation. 

% Uniformity

Coefficient of Variation %

 

95.4

5

 

90.4

6

 

84.7

7

 

78.8

8

Expected uniformity in processing

73.3

9

 

68.3

10

 

63.7

11

 

58.2

12

 

55.8

13

 

52

14

 

49.5

15

 

46.8

16

 

 

As seen in Table 1, as CV increases, the uniformity decreases. At and below 12% CV, most equipment can accommodate the variation in carcass size. Above 12%, the equipment cannot be adjusted to the sizing extremes (very small and very large), which causes product loss.

The optimal uniformity target will vary for each plant and will depend on the amount of product and product mix being produced and the type of automation the plant is using. The amount of product lost to uniformity issues with the stunner and scalder will be similar among different plants. However, the value of uniformity increases for plants that have more automated equipment. Furthermore, uniformity is very important when sized product mixes are being produced. 

Measuring issues related to uniformity and improvements to reduce these process issues: 

  • In a sizing program driven by product mix, good uniformity places more birds in the most profitable product range and increases the total yield value. To check, create a graph of the live weight at each CV and calculate any change in value after an increase of birds in higher-value products.
  • If using electrical stun and auto-kill and assuming a properly adjusted stunner height, there is an increase in wing damage from bruises and breaks with an increase in CV. This could be measured by comparing stunning outcomes at end of stunner and calculating the difference between flocks with good uniformity (12 and below) and flocks with poor uniformity (greater than 12). 
  • In general, overscalding will be more prevalent with small birds, while wing and picker damage will be more prevalent for large birds. For small birds, assess overscald scores on large and small fillets and score wing and picker damage for large birds. 
  • Measure contamination in the venting process by evaluating the contamination of carcasses with gall fluid and the loss of eviscerated packs due to eviscerating issues measured at the evisceration equipment.
  • Determine any damage and breast meat loss at the auto croppers from the probes measured at cropping machine.
  • Evaluate inconsistent bird chilling in air chill where larger birds may be too warm and smaller birds may be dehydrated. For water chilling, measure the number of larger birds that are too warm and cause increasing floor and cutting losses. 
  • Auto cut-up and deboning equipment cannot adjust to each bird. Therefore, more rework and yield loss can be expected to increase with poor uniformity. As the variation in size increases, the amount of loss and product downgrade will increase, and the labor usage required for rework will also increase. 

Monitoring and measuring flock uniformity:

A processing plant cannot correct uniformity issues but can adjust processing and provide feedback to farms to help correct farm programs and management issues. If uniformity is a consistent issue, the farm program may need to be reevaluated and corrected. If uniformity is occasionally an issue, changes in personnel or management may be the cause. To identify and correct uniformity issues, uniformity should be monitored regularly. Two methods for regular monitoring include:

  • Measuring live bird weight at the receiving dock of the processing plant. In this case, sample 100 birds, but select those 100 birds from multiple containers on the truck. 
  • Collecting and measuring sizes of carcasses in the packaging area can also provide information related to uniformity. However, this measurement is not as accurate as live weight because the impact of processing and chilling varies from bird to bird. 

 

If your operation has issues with uniformity, begin by collecting data at the plant. Measure uniformity throughout the process by comparing processing data as described in this article. If issues with uniformity cannot be identified with processing plant data, collecting data and conducting trials at the farm can also be a valuable tool to help correct uniformity. 

 

Page 1 of 51
Next Page