World Wildlife Fund launching egg sustainability study

The World Wildlife Fund, with support from U.S. egg farming groups, is launching a study to better understand the environmental impact of various types of egg production used around the globe.

Austin 70x70 Headshot
iStock
iStock

The World Wildlife Fund, with support from U.S. egg farming groups, is launching a study to better understand the environmental impact of various types of egg production used around the globe.

United Egg Producers President and CEO Chad Gregory, speaking at an area briefing in Des Moines, Iowa, on August 29, said the study could potentially provide additional credibility to arguments that cage-free egg production is not the best option for the environment.

Since McDonalds Corp. announced its plans to sell only cage-free eggs at its restaurants in the U.S. and Canada in September 2015, the trend swept across the country and spread around the world. According to U.S. Department of Agriculture estimates shared at the briefing, 229 food companies and grocery stores made cage-free commitments and 223 million cage-free hens will be needed by 2025 to meet cage-free demand.

Gregory said the environmental impact study will examine caged, cage-free and enriched colony production around the world. As part of the sustainability research, the report will also consider the food safety and animal welfare levels of each production system, too. He said it’s likely the study will conclude enriched colony housing is the best choice for a future with more people and fewer resources.

Since the cage-free movement began, some egg producers argued cage-free production is less efficient and less sustainable than enriched colony housing. The Coalition For Sustainable Egg Supply’s 2015 report made a similar conclusion, but the report did not prevent cage-free production from rapidly becoming an industry standard.

The hope, Gregory said, is that the WWF’s third-party position and international credibility will be able to provide some egg farmers the support they need to argue for retaining some sort of caged egg production in the future. If the conclusion matches the prediction, then the results could go a long way toward proving the merits of cage-produced eggs to consumers and retailers.

Additionally, the study could preserve the conventionally raised egg market and prevent a 100 percent cage-free future. Consumer research shows that strong, independent organizations are credible with consumers and it’s possible the involvement of the WWF could be more convincing than just the egg industry alone.

Gregory could not share a time frame for the study, but said a panel is formed and staffed with numerous luminaries from the egg, agriculture and animal welfare spheres. He named Dr. Hongwei Xin, director of the Egg Industry Center and a distinguished professor at Iowa State University’s College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, and Dr. Joy Mench, a professor emeritus at the University of California – Davis’ Department of Animal Science, among others on the panel.

The study will cost an estimated $182,000. The majority of the funding is coming from the American Egg Board and a percentage is coming from the U.S. Poultry & Egg Association and egg industry allies. There is a small gap in funding right now, but Gregory said he’s confident the funds will be found.

In a statement issued on September 16, the WWF said it is "commissioning scientific research to better understand the environmental and sustainability impacts of different egg production systems and potential opportunities for improvement within these systems.

"It will be conducted and reviewed independently by a diverse mix of experts, including those with animal welfare expertise. This research fits into WWF’s overall work to reduce the impacts of livestock production, including eggs, on native habitats, fresh water, climate, and biodiversity.”

The WWF, based in Washington, works to protect endangered species and threatened wildlife by focusing on forest, marine and freshwater biomes as well as wildlife, food and climate.

Page 1 of 1602
Next Page